Guidance, apply to, and candidate sex inside the You

101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond worry about-report: Having fun with latency to resolve design the question responding techniques on web-centered public opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook to have Political Communication Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Bing Beginner

102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you can Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political thinking will vary with mental faculties,” Technology , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle College student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are female prone to choose to have ladies’ items debts than just the male associates?” Legislative Studies Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Feminine Build: The policy Feeling of women during the Congress ( Chicago : School of Chi town Press , 2002 ).Google Pupil

105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and you can Hurley , Patricia An excellent. , “Emblematic speeches throughout the U.S. Senate and their representational effects,” Log regarding Government 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Should blacks show blacks and you will feminine show women? An excellent contingent ‘yes’,” Record away from Politics 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related governmental training additionally the detailed symbolization of asianbeautydating Mobile females,” Political Behavior 2003 , 25 : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle College student

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Could there be a good ‘gender attraction effect’ within the American government? S. Family elections,” Governmental Search Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Student

This informative article might have been quoted of the following courses. It listing is generated based on analysis provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An excellent. and you can Lust, Ellen 2015. Could it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A role Congruity Principle away from Applicant Electability within the Transformation Tunisia. Views to your Government, Vol. thirteen, Matter. 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Whom stereotypes women applicants? Distinguishing private variations in women label dependence. Government, Teams, and you may Identities, Vol. 3, Thing. step 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The newest part of gender during the detailed icon,” Political Browse Quarterly 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female attack. Politics as well as the Lives Sciences, Vol. 34, Point. step one, p. forty two.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you can Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving blended indicators: brand new part regarding gender and partisanship into the feedback of politicians. Diary out of Elections, Public-opinion and you will Functions, Vol. 26, Situation. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Which have Center and you will (No) Mind? Just how Receiver Negatively Infer Missing Information about Political figures and exactly how This Affects the brand new Research of your Speakermunication Research, Vol. 43, Situation. eight, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Attitudes away from Women Political leaders: Happening from Poland. Politics within the Main Europe, Vol. 14, Matter. step 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and you may Bos, Angela L. 2019. Using Public Character Concept towards Examination of Gender during the Government. Governmental Psychology, Vol. 40, Procedure. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunlight More youthful and Baek, More youthful Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence on Female People in politics: Why Ambivalence Things to own Gender Equality in the an excellent Democracy. Log of women, Government & Rules, Vol. forty, Thing. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Assassination and you can Ladies in Government. Corvinus Record off Around the world Points, Vol. 4, Question. step one, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Governmental Leadership on the Media: Gender Bias for the Frontrunner Stereotypes while in the Promotion and you will Routine Moments. British Log out of Governmental Technology, Vol. 50, Point. step three, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how do Owners Evaluate Path?Height Bureaucrats’ Warmth and you may Proficiency? A beneficial Typology and you can Shot. Societal Management Feedback, Vol. 80, Material. cuatro, p. 532.